It seems like every
article I read on a major disruptive technology (for example: self driving
cars, commercial drones, electronic medical records) goes along the same lines:
1.
This technology will be applied to greatly
improve something (efficiency, safety, etc.)
2.
There are some hurdles to adoption such as legal
issues, privacy issues, lack of standards, accommodating legacy technology,
general public acceptance.
3.
Though the technology is 80% of the way there
today, don't expect to see it for another 15-20 years due to these hurdles.
In other words:
These breakthroughs exist in labs but will take a long time to get to towns and
cities.
It got me thinking,
what if there was a city that was a lab, CityLab?
Imagine a CityLab,
say 5 miles square of 150k population and a mix of population density sectors
in which the hurdles for technology adoption where eliminated or dramatically
reduced. For example:
1)
Legacy technologies would be prohibited to give
new technologies the chance to achieve critical mass.
a)
Paper
money and maybe even credit cards would be prohibited and replaced with
ubiquitous e-wallets on cell phones or even biometric identifiers.
b)
Self
driven cars would not be allowed, only autonomous cars.
c)
Paper
records prohibited for electronic
d)
While not
prohibited, retail stores would be minimized and replaced by next hour delivery
of products.
2)
Government red tape would be eliminated and
replaced by a minimum set of web interfaces.
a)
Processing
a new employee hiring should be a few clicks not 5 sets of paper work
b)
Taxes
should flow automatically with each transaction - no paperwork required
3)
Every citizen of the city would have to sign a
"user agreement" to share certain data and use certain technologies, (and may even waive certain rights).
a)
Share GPS
coordinates to allocate an autonomous fleet of taxis
b)
Share
anonymous health data to improve medical research
The CityLab would
serve as a proof of concept development zone for new technologies with a
citizenry of willing early adopters. Here is the basic process:
1)
First, new technologies would be prototyped (standardized
when needed) and iterated through (almost) real world conditions to demonstrate
maturity. For example a fleet of autonomous cars is prototyped in the field
with new version of sensors and software until accident rates are 20% of a
self-driving cars.
2)
Alongside technology development, policy
development could also rapidly iterate to optimize the legal framework for the
technologies' use. For example policies are established on transportation of
teenagers, those without licenses, blind operators, inebriated operators and
liability for accidents based on data collected about accident rates.
3)
The end goal would be to accelerate many of the
processes that dramatically slow down the adoption of technology and provide
a path for other regions (cities,
states, countries, etc.) to adopt the
technology. Eventually these technologies would retrofit into the existing
world, but would greatly benefit from being incubated in the CityLab.
In addition to
citizens - corporations and nations / states would greatly benefit from a
CityLab. Major corporations such as
Google, Microsoft, Amazon as well as startups would get a chance to accelerate
their technology within the CityLab. As such, these corporations would also transfer
employees to the CityLab to work and live and would fund most of the upfront
costs. CityLab could be setup as a
non-profit or a joint venture between multiple companies and governments.
Governments would
benefit from (1) direct tax collections from the CityLab area (hopefully vastly
simplified vs. collections from all of the members of a typical city), (2) a test bed for public policy, and (3)
accelerated technology to drive the overall economy (and increase tax revenue). To host the CityLab, Governments (for example
California, Oregon, and Mexico) would have to compete to offer the best
incentive package of regulation suspension, land grants, infrastructure funds
and transportation links.
What would it take to
get this from a seed of an idea to reality?:
1)
Medium depth white paper (30-60 pages) outlining
the value proposition and implementation details:
a)
How to achieve what companies really want (i.e.
how do you maximize technological progress and industry collaborations with
enough IP protection that innovators get financial returns.)
b)
Technology specific addendums on how a CityLab
will accelerate different technologies (for example: self driving cars,
commercial drones, electronic medical records)
c)
Planning of the basic legal structures
i)
Ownership / Non-Profit structure of CityLab
ii)
Individuals - privacy rights, property rights etc.
iii)
Companies - IP, liability etc.
iv)
Relationship to government - whose policies apply
when
d)
Development of funding options (private funding,
funding by tech companies, etc.)
e)
Analysis of new construction vs zoning an
existing city
2)
Shop around for corporate, government and private
investor interest and feedback. (Between these sources the CityLab must draw
citizens, construction funding, land, and rights (or wavier of typical
regulations).
3)
Incorporate feedback and sign up partners -
likely large tech companies plus some gov't agencies, DoE, DARPA, etc.
4)
Refine detailed plan and have governments compete
to host with packages of land and regulation abatement.
As listed above, there are many
areas which would require detailed planning to realize the benefits of a CityLab. Unwinding the tangled web of inhibitors to technology adoption and maximizing
efficiency would not be simple, but the promise of getting revolutionary
technologies in to the mass market 10 years earlier would be well worth the
effort. In fact, perhaps most interesting is not the development of the next
wave of technology but how these technologies interact with each other when
each are at scale and insight future waves of technology that isn’t even
currently in labs. The interplay between autonomous electric vehicles, smart
grids, clean energy, and massive data would be one example where you need a
lot of “chickens” and “eggs” to move forward.
I'd love your
feedback, please use the comments to let me know what you think. If there's
significant interest in pushing this idea forward, the next step is probably to
setup a wiki structured site for crowd development of the white paper. Check back here for more updates.
No comments:
Post a Comment